To publicly support a military aggression while still residing in the aggressed country one has to be very brave or mentally deranged. In any case let him RIP.
Before good times there will be a lot of bad times for bitcoin or his successor. I foresee a complete rebuilding of its architecture since the current one can't support industrial transaction rates, full ban and criminalization of its use by authorities with resulting extreme volatility.
To cut spending on the army would be his huge mistake. Argentina had wars before and certainly would need its army again at some point. Ukraine did just this mistake and now foreign troops occupy one quarter of its territory.
Democrats are in power now and won't lose this opportunity to inflict damage on 'damned cryptocurrency'. Not that republicans love it either but at least they have been keeping appearance of being neutral.
I have dumped all BCH (not that I had very much), stopped BTC accumulation and focused on LTC. Why? Because LTC requires a minuscule transaction fee right now and probably could be atomically swapped with BTC while bypassing centralized exchanges in the future.
Actually I don't see here a...
You have many more enemies that you could ever imagine but for now they are all love and smile. Many years are needed to see who is who. This understanding usually comes that moment when you are laughed at.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.