Our valued sponsor

KuCoin Case: US Win Uncertain, China's Next Move Key

wellington

Mentor Group Gold
Nov 14, 2020
2,025
1,899
113
Visit site
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: jafo
Apart from paper companies and some data from infrastructure providers.

I doubt the US get's a big win here as these chaps are in China, will be interesting to see if China throws them to the wolves with how it needs USD flowing into stem it's currency debasement.


CFTC putting a jab in: CFTC Charges KuCoin with Operating Illegal Digital Asset Derivatives Exchange | CFTC
The banking cartel/gang using the state-sponsored violent mafia to eliminate ANY and ALL competition regardless of jurisdiction rof/%

This kid said it out loud in the early 90s and was met with an "unfortunate" demise:
 
  • Like
Reactions: cryptofriendly
Just read it here

The exchange was charged under the Bank Secrecy Act.

It's crazy how many folks are getting accused of money laundering and dodging taxes in the crypto scene these days. There's gotta be some truth to it, but it feels like the authorities are pulling out all the stops just so they can have an excuse to clamp down hard on the crypto market. They must really feel like they're up against the wall.
 
Just read it here



It's crazy how many folks are getting accused of money laundering and dodging taxes in the crypto scene these days. There's gotta be some truth to it, but it feels like the authorities are pulling out all the stops just so they can have an excuse to clamp down hard on the crypto market. They must really feel like they're up against the wall.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

I guess we are between fight and win stage now, as even Blackrock has ETFs on BTC now.
Just a question of time for pension funds to invest in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belarus and jafo
Just a question of time for pension funds to invest in it.
Some already do:

Other big one plans to do:
 
Just read it here



It's crazy how many folks are getting accused of money laundering and dodging taxes in the crypto scene these days. There's gotta be some truth to it, but it feels like the authorities are pulling out all the stops just so they can have an excuse to clamp down hard on the crypto market. They must really feel like they're up against the wall.
thats the common ruleset they use. Because its guilty until proven innocent.
Its not specific to the crypto sector.
 
  • Like
Reactions: belarus and jafo
To be fair, unsure why anyone would use a CEX after FTX... most of the trading can be on-chain and the only time you need a fully centralised entity is when off-boarding to fiat, otherwise most stuff can be done with custodial control these days (even ETH->BTC etc).

Just read it here



It's crazy how many folks are getting accused of money laundering and dodging taxes in the crypto scene these days. There's gotta be some truth to it, but it feels like the authorities are pulling out all the stops just so they can have an excuse to clamp down hard on the crypto market. They must really feel like they're up against the wall.
This one is interesting as they appear to have access to heaps of data, but not the owners themselves, so i am surmising they have access through the infrastructure chosen (AWS/Cloudflare?)

Also interesting is you rarely see if ever Non-US Banks being indicted criminally as the US had exposure to either the $ or US Residents to the activities in the bank where some laundering occurred.

Even the big German shell banking game a few years ago didn't involve a US Indictment even though you can be pretty certain they used SWIFT/USD and went through SDNY.

CFTC:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE


11. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federalquestion jurisdiction) and 28 U.S.C. § 1345 (district courts have original jurisdiction over civilactions commenced by the United States or by any agency expressly authorized to sue by Act ofCongress). Section 6c of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1(a), authorizes the CFTC to seek injunctiverelief against any person whenever it shall appear to the CFTC that such person has engaged, isengaging, or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision ofthe CEA or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder.

12. Venue properly lies with this Court pursuant to Section 6c(e) of the CEA,
7 U.S.C. § 13a-1(e), because Defendants transacted business in the Southern District of NewYork, and Defendants engaged in acts and practices in violation of the CEA and Regulationswithin this District.

DOJ:
Indictment: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/media/1345231/dl

- 31 U.S. Code § 5330 - Registration of money transmitting businesses
- Violation of the Bank Secrecy Act
- Conspiracies


Not sure on the statute of limitations, CFTC is going back to 2019 (so 4yr-8 month) but DOJ is going back to 2017.... for conspiracy it's the last overt act, which sets the ball rolling again, and then allows the tagging of old activities as a furtherance...

Note: Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business | 18 U.S.C. § 1960

When discussing Crypto projects with friends considering moving into the space, always say, steer clear of

- US Infrastructure
_ US Persons
- US Employees
- USD
- SWIFT
- US Language (version of English)
- US Directed Marketing

Applies to hiring dual or having end users being dual or residence in the US.

Build out for Global South.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jafo and belarus
To be fair, unsure why anyone would use a CEX after FTX... most of the trading can be on-chain and the only time you need a fully centralised entity is when off-boarding to fiat, otherwise most stuff can be done with custodial control these days (even ETH->BTC etc).


This one is interesting as they appear to have access to heaps of data, but not the owners themselves, so i am surmising they have access through the infrastructure chosen (AWS/Cloudflare?)

Also interesting is you rarely see if ever Non-US Banks being indicted criminally as the US had exposure to either the $ or US Residents to the activities in the bank where some laundering occurred.

Even the big German shell banking game a few years ago didn't involve a US Indictment even though you can be pretty certain they used SWIFT/USD and went through SDNY.

CFTC:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE


11. This Court has jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federalquestion jurisdiction) and 28 U.S.C. § 1345 (district courts have original jurisdiction over civilactions commenced by the United States or by any agency expressly authorized to sue by Act ofCongress). Section 6c of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. § 13a-1(a), authorizes the CFTC to seek injunctiverelief against any person whenever it shall appear to the CFTC that such person has engaged, isengaging, or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any provision ofthe CEA or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder.

12. Venue properly lies with this Court pursuant to Section 6c(e) of the CEA,
7 U.S.C. § 13a-1(e), because Defendants transacted business in the Southern District of NewYork, and Defendants engaged in acts and practices in violation of the CEA and Regulationswithin this District.

DOJ:
Indictment: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/media/1345231/dl

- 31 U.S. Code § 5330 - Registration of money transmitting businesses
- Violation of the Bank Secrecy Act
- Conspiracies


Not sure on the statute of limitations, CFTC is going back to 2019 (so 4yr-8 month) but DOJ is going back to 2017.... for conspiracy it's the last overt act, which sets the ball rolling again, and then allows the tagging of old activities as a furtherance...

Note: Unlicensed Money Transmitting Business | 18 U.S.C. § 1960

When discussing Crypto projects with friends considering moving into the space, always say, steer clear of

- US Infrastructure
_ US Persons
- US Employees
- USD
- SWIFT
- US Language (version of English)
- US Directed Marketing

Applies to hiring dual or having end users being dual or residence in the US.

Build out for Global South.
Leverage and shitcoins

Kucoin already losing lot of liquidity from their exchange since the announcement
The only CEX left where you can deposit and withdrawl a decent amount without KYC
 
  • Like
Reactions: jafo
Also interesting is you rarely see if ever Non-US Banks being indicted criminally as the US had exposure to either the $ or US Residents to the activities in the bank where some laundering occurred.

Even the big German shell banking game a few years ago didn't involve a US Indictment even though you can be pretty certain they used SWIFT/USD and went through SDNY.
Easy to understand! I'll explain...

Some jurisdictions, like loyal die-hard families, i.e., China, Iran, Russia, etc., defend their families until the last blood. Others, e.g., vassal states, turn over their own family (read citizens and residents) as their self-preservation is brought to their attention, and the US agencies enter into these agreements, e.g. 9-27.000 - Principles of Federal Prosecution and 9-28.000 - Principles of Federal Prosecution Of Business Organizations

1711545719753.png


1711546301471.png


with "defendants" before the (sealed) indictment, as it brings in much more money for the agencies, less work, and MORE snitches! (aka. Confidential Informants). Most accused capitulate, bend over, and spell R-U-N. Most, when I say most, I mean +95% of the accused will turn over their own offspring or parents in my personal experience. I've witnessed this so many times; it's mind-boggling and frankly disconcerting. cry&¤

So, as you can witness, those who cooperate and are willing to turn over on others are spared and continue life as Confidential Informants (in perpetuity). The US has so many confidential informants scattered around the globe that it would blow people's minds if they knew the real numbers.

Incidentally, China and Iran KNEW this and took measures!

1711546566501.png


There is NO mystery to this. People aren't admitting guilt, plea bargain***, because they are guilty; they are doing it because if they do NOT, they are likely to die in prison, or one of their (innocent) relatives or friends would. The US doesn't give a flying f*ck! It's called in Spanish: "La Lista Clinton." Source: La pesadilla de estar en la lista Clinton por error

Plea Bargain:

John Oliver did a show about this, and I must say, he underestimated the evilness and corruption of the system by multiple orders of magnitude! ca#"!
 
Were they able to do anything to them? Do you think the exchange will survive?
Kucoin is laughing ALL the way to the bank! smi(&%
Rules, law, judges, prosecutors, cops, etc., etc., are NOT magical beings.... they are USELESS if we have the BIGGER & STRONGER stick!
Not to excuse "mala in se" acts! Those are inexcusable! That hill, I am willing to die on.

Now, mala prohibita? That's a whole new level of cowardice by delusional weak fanatics hellbent on subjugating those stronger and more able than them. A few dastardly unproductive parasite gang members scribbling some jibberish on paper, doing a ritual, and calling it law is USELESS and folly if they can't back it up with a stronger army than ours.

This is Kucoin now:
1712328378132.png


Long live Kucoin!
 

A Miami man has been slapped with a nearly five-year prison sentence for running a high-volume illegal cryptocurrency exchange. Raul Rodriguez, 44, better known in online circles as raultiovigia, was hit with 57 months in federal clink for operating an unlicensed money transmitting business

-> Never understood this US law, not sure if the UK has similar, but seems to be a method to control the free-flow of capital.

It can't be about money laundering or cartels, as all the big banks service those anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jafo

A Miami man has been slapped with a nearly five-year prison sentence for running a high-volume illegal cryptocurrency exchange. Raul Rodriguez, 44, better known in online circles as raultiovigia, was hit with 57 months in federal clink for operating an unlicensed money transmitting business

-> Never understood this US law, not sure if the UK has similar, but seems to be a method to control the free-flow of capital.

It can't be about money laundering or cartels, as all the big banks service those anyway.
like the substance trade, only "licensed" entities are allowed to do it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jafo and wellington
They also have laws against DEX'es where there is no real owner.
If its a DEX with no owner the people who are making that DEX possible to run activly like
programers,node providers,committee's are held fully responsible

Problem with a truely decentralied platform is, chicken and egg...

you have to use a altcoin for gas to get it going and that's the grapple point for the deployment of the smart contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jafo

A Miami man has been slapped with a nearly five-year prison sentence for running a high-volume illegal cryptocurrency exchange. Raul Rodriguez, 44, better known in online circles as raultiovigia, was hit with 57 months in federal clink for operating an unlicensed money transmitting business

-> Never understood this US law, not sure if the UK has similar, but seems to be a method to control the free-flow of capital.

It can't be about money laundering or cartels, as all the big banks service those anyway.
Poor chap! His revenues ($5M) were barely enough to cover half of his legal defense fees if he wanted to mount a defense. He was just railroaded!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cryptofriendly

Latest Threads