In a European country known for being particularly aggressive on tax enforcement, how long does a person need to be physically present before the tax authorities might assert that a permanent establishment (PE) has been created for a foreign company?
Specifically, consider the case of an individual who is a citizen of that European country, but is currently a tax resident in a non-European jurisdiction, where their company is also legally registered and operating.
If this individual returns to their home country for several months (e.g. 4–5 months), performs only remote administrative tasks (like invoicing), and does not engage in local business development, meetings, or contract negotiations,could this still be enough for local authorities to argue the existence of a PE?
Does the combination of citizenship, temporary physical presence, and remote work increase the PE risk, even in the absence of any physical infrastructure or employees in the European country?
Specifically, consider the case of an individual who is a citizen of that European country, but is currently a tax resident in a non-European jurisdiction, where their company is also legally registered and operating.
If this individual returns to their home country for several months (e.g. 4–5 months), performs only remote administrative tasks (like invoicing), and does not engage in local business development, meetings, or contract negotiations,could this still be enough for local authorities to argue the existence of a PE?
Does the combination of citizenship, temporary physical presence, and remote work increase the PE risk, even in the absence of any physical infrastructure or employees in the European country?