Our valued sponsor

Euro Pacific bank is a scam

If you don't trust PR and you say PR is bankrupt why did you relocate the bank to PR and not to US mainland or another Caribbean Island? Because the PR licence was easy and cheap for you and PR is NON- CRS!
This is an interesting point. Could've placed EPB in Miami and it still would've been non-CRS. At the time, FATCA reciprocity was basically non-existent.

It would've required complying with state and federal banking regulations, though, and increased costs.

This horse is already dead, though. Beating it further does nothing. The liquidation will take the time it takes, which unfortunately seems to be many years still.
 
No U.S. states are part of CRS. I wanted an off-shore bank.. If on shore I would have needed to be FDIC. But I was a 100% reserve bank. So I didn't need to incur all that added cost when I had no need for government insurance. Customers benefitted from that with lower fees. I also didn't want to have the bank in tax haven, as it was too hard to get correspondent banking relationship. Also, in Puerto Rico I was able to get an account a the Fed as well as a deal to be a global issuer with of American Express. I would not have been able to do this in another Caribbean island. Also, at the time I thought as a U.S..territory, Puerto Rico would be a safer location for the bank. It ddi not matter that the island itself was bankrupt as we were not loaning the Puerto Rican government any money. Plus, I lived in Puerto Rico myself. So not only was it convenient to have the bank there too, but there were considerable tax advantages for me personally to have the bank there. You can't blame me for not anticipating that an illegal conspiracy between five nations, and reporters for the NY Times and The Age would destroy the bank and result in the circumstances that exist today. Customers didn't anticipate it either, or they never would have opened accounts at the bank. Also, no customer was forced to transfer the funds or metals to Qenta. Everyone who did had to Opt-In. Plus, no customers have their money back yet, so it's too soon to tell if Opt. In customers are actually at a disadvantage. Lastly, why do you keep saying "same old story?" It's not a story, it's the truth. This is what actually happend. Yet you keep insisting on blaming me for actions that were completely beyond my control. Blame the corrupt governments who did this to you, not me.
 
This is an interesting point. Could've placed EPB in Miami and it still would've been non-CRS. At the time, FATCA reciprocity was basically non-existent.

It would've required complying with state and federal banking regulations, though, and increased costs.

This horse is already dead, though. Beating it further does nothing. The liquidation will take the time it takes, which unfortunately seems to be many years still.
Again, if I opened the bank in Miami it would have been much too expensive to be a 100% reserve bank, especially having to pay for FDIC insurance that I did not need. Also, there are lots of banks in Fla. and other U.S. states that Euro Pacific Bank customers could have opened accounts with. But they choose not to. I offered a different type of bank that was not available in U.S. states. What governments did to my bank was unprecedented. I did not anticipate this happening. I lost over $10 million myself as a result. Clearly I never would have stated this bank had I foreseen this outcome. Customers would not have jumped thought all the extra compliance hoops to open accounts had they foreseen it either.
 
By the way Qenta has told me they intend to update Opt-Ins soon, and they have not indicated that they are not positioned to make customer funds available to customers.
Hello Peter, You must have missed my earlier reply, so I will ask again :) When did you last spoke to Qenta and can you tell me who you are in contact with? Can you elaborate on when 'soon' will be? Is it a few days or weeks? They have all my money and I am very concerned. Thank you
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radko
Of course they wanted to play banker and without investing in a proper setup. In Miami you need at least 10 Mio USD equity in PR at that time 500k USD lol.
PS is accountable to his (former) depositors - thats my personal opinion...
If by accountable you mean legally personally liable for their losses, you are wrong. If bank shareholders where personally liable for any losses suffered by customers there would be no banks. If directors where also personally liable to bank customers there would be no directors, which would also mean no banks. There is no bank in the world where you can lose money then go after shareholders for your losses. The only way is if shareholders illegally divert bank assets, including customer deposits, to themselves. But since I started the bank in 2011, I never once took any money out of the bank. The bank never paid me a dividend, I never took a salary, as I was neither an officer nor an employee, and as a director I was unpaid. So no one can accuse me of diverting bank assets to myself. In fact, when the bank got into trouble based on the false allegations made by the media on behalf of the J5, not only did I not take any money out of the bank, but I put another $7 million into the bank to protect customers. I could have just walked away and cut my losses. But I chose not to.
 
Well, no customer every had a problem withdrawing their funds but when I did it I've always been asked WHY and what was the purpose of my withdrawal. That's weird, isn't it? Please don't talk about compliance, money laundering etc., that would sound even more weird.
Yes, all of those questions were asked as a result of the bank's extra strict KYC and AML. That is why its so outrageous that the J5 and the media worked together to shut the bank down for money laundering and tax evasion, when there was likely less of that going on at my bank than at any other offshore bank in the world. We needed to be extra strict to continue offering the services we offered, and the additional services we were planning to offer in the future. Do you think I liked spending millions per year on compliance? It would have been much easier and cheaper for me to just send out money no-questions asked. If customers didn't think having an account at Euro Pacific Bank was worth the extra hassle they could have close their accounts. In fact, many did for that reason. Why do you think not a single one of the bank's 500 UK customers that Simon York claimed used the bank to commit tax evasion or money laundering was ever charged, let alone convicted of either crime? That's because criminals used other banks, that did not have such strict KYC and AML, to commit their crimes.
 
Yes, all of those questions were asked as a result of the bank's extra strict KYC and AML. That is why its so outrageous that the J5 and the media worked together to shut the bank down for money laundering and tax evasion, when there was likely less of that going on at my bank than at any other offshore bank in the world. We needed to be extra strict to continue offering the services we offered, and the additional services we were planning to offer in the future. Do you think I liked spending millions per year on compliance? It would have been much easier and cheaper for me to just send out money no-questions asked. If customers didn't think having an account at Euro Pacific Bank was worth the extra hassle they could have close their accounts. In fact, many did for that reason. Why do you think not a single one of the bank's 500 UK customers that Simon York claimed used the bank to commit tax evasion or money laundering was ever charged, let alone convicted of either crime? That's because criminals used other banks, that did not have such strict KYC and AML, to commit their crimes.

You keep defending EPB and Yourself, which I understand.
But please, Opt-in customers are in the dark, Qenta ignores all of us, is it too much to ask you to call Brent for 5 minutes and ask him what is going on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCHLOSSFINANZ
You keep defending EPB and Yourself, which I understand.
But please, Opt-in customers are in the dark, Qenta ignores all of us, is it too much to ask you to call Brent for 5 minutes and ask him what is going on?
It would be great if Qenta can post a very quick update on europacbank.com It does not have to be much, a one line saying they will contact customers 'soon'. This should only take 5 minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radko
No U.S. states are part of CRS. I wanted an off-shore bank.. If on shore I would have needed to be FDIC.

I would say that FDIC would have helped a lot of people.

But I was a 100% reserve bank. So I didn't need to incur all that added cost when I had no need for government insurance. Customers benefitted from that with lower fees.

Cutting corners clearly has not worked.


Anyway would be nice if you focused on Qenta for those that opted-in clients rather than constantly banging the same old drum that J5 was out to get you and everybody is corrupt and in the wrong and your totally innocent. Your someone that worked with Qenta to get the deal done for sale of assets. Seems very strange the lack of communication. Maybe you forgot some comunication between them and yourself like you forgot you were the Chairman of the bank.
 
You keep defending EPB and Yourself, which I understand.
But please, Opt-in customers are in the dark, Qenta ignores all of us, is it too much to ask you to call Brent for 5 minutes and ask him what is going on?
I've asked many times. Not just for customers, but for myself. The last email he sent me was that Qenta would be updating Opt In customers soon. He did not define soon, but if he was being honest, I expect an update this week. Next week at the latest. But I keep defending myself and the bank as we both keep getting attacked. Instead anger should be directed toward the corrupt government officials and "journalists" who did this to me and customers.
 
can you also be constructive? FDIC would have given all depositors their money up tp 100k USD back in 7-10 banking days!
PS is just cheap because he didn't want to pay for FDIC insurance. Anyway I am 100% sure EPB would have never qualified for membership anyway.