Hi there!
I wanted to get some thoughts on the below structure:
*Company A is based in a high-tax EU jurisdiction. Ownership is 50/50 between Matteo (director living in the same high-tax jurisdiction) and Enrique (no involvement / not tax resident in the same jurisdiction).
*Company B is based in a low-tax EU jurisdiction. Ownership is 100% Enrique (who is the director and a tax resident in the same low-tax jurisdiction).
*Company C is based in a different low-tax EU jurisdiction. Ownership is 50/50 between Matteo (no involvement) and Enrique (director yet not living in the same low-tax jurisdiction but travelling frequently to visit)
Company B is Enrique's consultancy company, with which it invoices Company A for its consultancy services. It meets substance requirements and has a rented office.
Company C is a customer support services company that invoices Company C for its customer support services. It has the appropriate substance (employee + company owned office).
Company A continues to operate in the high-tax EU jurisdiction and continues to pay corporate tax. However, it now faces two sizable outflows to Company B and Company C (which in total represent about 10% of Company A's annual turnover).
All companies pay yearly dividends to Matteo & Enrique.
Any thoughts welcome!
I wanted to get some thoughts on the below structure:
*Company A is based in a high-tax EU jurisdiction. Ownership is 50/50 between Matteo (director living in the same high-tax jurisdiction) and Enrique (no involvement / not tax resident in the same jurisdiction).
*Company B is based in a low-tax EU jurisdiction. Ownership is 100% Enrique (who is the director and a tax resident in the same low-tax jurisdiction).
*Company C is based in a different low-tax EU jurisdiction. Ownership is 50/50 between Matteo (no involvement) and Enrique (director yet not living in the same low-tax jurisdiction but travelling frequently to visit)
Company B is Enrique's consultancy company, with which it invoices Company A for its consultancy services. It meets substance requirements and has a rented office.
Company C is a customer support services company that invoices Company C for its customer support services. It has the appropriate substance (employee + company owned office).
Company A continues to operate in the high-tax EU jurisdiction and continues to pay corporate tax. However, it now faces two sizable outflows to Company B and Company C (which in total represent about 10% of Company A's annual turnover).
All companies pay yearly dividends to Matteo & Enrique.
Any thoughts welcome!