Our valued sponsor

Master Feeder Fund, you ever heard about it before? Learn more..

craigs

Corporate Services
Business Angel
Oct 3, 2012
61
44
18
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.
A master-feeder fund is, most commonly, a two-tiered investment structure in which investors deposit capital in a ?feeder? fund, which in turn invests in a ?master? fund that is managed by the same investment advisor. The master fund is the entity that invests in the market as prescribed in the partnership agreement.


The feeder fund is generally where the capital investing begins: capital (cash or securities) flows from investors into feeders, and these in turn invest all or a portion of that capital into the master fund. The master fund then uses that infusion of capital to invest in securities and thereby generate profit and loss. This profit and loss that the master fund generates is then allocated to all of the master fund?s constituent feeders. From the master fund?s perspective, each feeder can be viewed as an investor.


Master Feeder Packages


Master Feeder (Cayman)

  • Offshore master fund entity
  • Offshore feeder fund entity
  • Full colour offering document


Mini-Master (Cayman)

  • Master Fund Entity
  • Full colour offering document
  • Full colour offering document


When you think of a feeder fund investing in a master fund, think of it as a fund buying any other security. For example, the feeder fund (where all the limited partner/shareholder* capital resides) buys ?shares? of a master fund, similarly to the way it buys shares of IBM common stock.


One significant operational difference between purchasing common stock and purchasing shares of a master fund is that when a fund buys a share of common stock, it does not ?peer into? the underlying income attributes of that stock. Rather, the total return of the stock comprises only price appreciation and dividend income distributions. By contrast, when a fund buys a share of a master fund, it is buying into an investment partnership, and thus all the different income attributes (such as dividends, interest, gains, and tax adjustments) that the master fund generates are passed through to the feeder fund.


Master-Feeder Fund Structures


A typical master-feeder structure includes one master fund with one U.S. (?onshore?) feeder and one non-U.S. (?offshore?) feeder. The benefit of this organization is that it does not restrict the investor fund to just one type of investor (that is, tax-exempt versus U.S. taxable).


Feeder funds that invest in the same master fund can differ from one another in their investor types, investment minimums, fee structures, net asset values, and other operational features. In other words, a feeder fund is not tied to a particular master fund, but rather functions as its own legal entity, a partnership in its own right, that can invest in any number of master funds. The converse is also true: a master fund can accept investments from any number of feeders.


A master fund is typically an offshore corporation, but it can ?check the box? and elect to be taxed as a partnership for U.S. tax purposes. If an onshore feeder fund invests in an offshore master fund taxed as a U.S. partnership or a limited liability company, the feeder will receive ?pass-through? treatment for its share of the master fund?s profit and loss. The investment managers or general partners of offshore funds can be offshore corporations owned substantially by the fund manager or the manager?s U.S. entity.


[video=youtube_share;i3D8c7aKc0g]


Disadvantages of a master-feeder structure include the following:

  • An offshore fund is generally subject to 30% withholding tax on U.S. dividends. If a fund tries to avoid such transactions, it incurs increased costs that it otherwise would not experience.
  • The different investment strategies available to a master-feeder do not offer advantages to all investors at all times. For example, long-term capital gains are beneficial for U.S. limited partners, but taxes are not a concern for offshore investors. Therefore, if the master fund holds a security longer to receive favorable tax treatment, strategy conflicts may result.
  • Some investment types, such as REITs and mutual funds, can be appropriate for U.S. investors, but inappropriate for offshore investors due to various regional restrictions.
  • Uneven allocations of profit and loss (such as hot issue versus non-hot issue) and tax accounting can become cumbersome, negating the time and/or cost savings gained from easier trade administration.


It may appear at first glance that the advantages of a master-feeder structure are outweighed by the disadvantages, but the balance depends on the individual fund. Fund structures and strategies must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine whether and when any obstacles are likely to present themselves.
 
Very interesting Craig, may I ask if you have operated such a structure in the past or still do? From the last few threads you posted it seems tou know a lot about it.
 
"An offshore fund is generally subject to 30% withholding tax on U.S. dividends."

What if its outside United States, would it still have the 30% withholding tax? Its very alarming since 30% is really huge for some people.
 
  • An offshore fund is generally subject to 30% withholding tax on U.S. dividends. If a fund tries to avoid such transactions, it incurs increased costs that it otherwise would not experience.
  • The different investment strategies available to a master-feeder do not offer advantages to all investors at all times. For example, long-term capital gains are beneficial for U.S. limited partners, but taxes are not a concern for offshore investors. Therefore, if the master fund holds a security longer to receive favorable tax treatment, strategy conflicts may result.
  • Some investment types, such as REITs and mutual funds, can be appropriate for U.S. investors, but inappropriate for offshore investors due to various regional restrictions.
  • Uneven allocations of profit and loss (such as hot issue versus non-hot issue) and tax accounting can become cumbersome, negating the time and/or cost savings gained from easier trade administration.
Actually some valuable information. Some need to do proper research when starting a fund to protect his assets. Most often a Fond + Trust combination with a IBC is what one will be looking for if large amounts need to be protected.
 
This is interesting but I believe most of it is rubish and not valid for the majrity of people here.
 
Register now
You must login or register to view hidden content on this page.