Our valued sponsor

The new world order

Well, you have not presented any facts that the elections were legitimate (I just re-read your previous posts and there are no facts, just claims). So, using your very own standard you just accused yourself.

At least in my case, I presented the fact that dozens of nations of the world found the elections illegitimate. By contrast, you presented no facts at all. Yet, you erroneously claimed that I am the one who presented no facts, when it was you who did so. That is exactly how people "debate" in socialist regimes.
Didnt even the highest geman court announced that germans elections where invalid for decades which makes indirectly all creates laws invalid ?
What changed ?Nothing ?WHO CARES IF VOTING WAS AND STILL IS INVALID BY LAW OR NOT IF THEY GET WHAT THEY WANT

 
Didnt even the highest geman court announced that germans elections where invalid for decades which makes indirectly all creates laws invalid ?
What changed ?Nothing ?WHO CARES IF VOTING WAS AND STILL IS INVALID BY LAW OR NOT IF THEY GET WHAT THEY WANT

Even a child knows that there is a difference between a mistake and a deliberate purposeful act.
 

Latest Threads