Our valued sponsor

The Pfizer vaccine ?

BEALMAN

New member
Aug 17, 2021
17
19
3
78
Georgia, USA
Visit site
Vaccines typically vaccinate, meaning you are protected against the disease. The current Pfizer, the miracle drug, without a test, history, or anything else to qualify it as a vaccine, is obviously not a vaccine!
After two shots, people are dying! Pfizer made billions in 2020, more billions in 2021, and now we are being advised that a follow-up every six months might be necessary!?
What kind of BS is this?
I'll explain for you: It is another government scam using the population as lab-rats, funding political, Nazi-friends with billions and the normal kick-backs to congress!
It is easy to understand. Follow the money, the documents, and the greed.

My son is a school administrator. Took the vaccine; caught the virus. Took a kid to the doctor last week, caught the virus again! Question: Do three shots guarantee three cases? How about four?
 
Vaccines typically vaccinate, meaning you are protected against the disease. The current Pfizer, the miracle drug, without a test, history, or anything else to qualify it as a vaccine, is obviously not a vaccine!
After two shots, people are dying! Pfizer made billions in 2020, more billions in 2021, and now we are being advised that a follow-up every six months might be necessary!?
What kind of BS is this?
I'll explain for you: It is another government scam using the population as lab-rats, funding political, Nazi-friends with billions and the normal kick-backs to congress!
It is easy to understand. Follow the money, the documents, and the greed.

My son is a school administrator. Took the vaccine; caught the virus. Took a kid to the doctor last week, caught the virus again! Question: Do three shots guarantee three cases? How about four?
Well, don't take it then. Roll the dice.
But let me tell you one thing, those who can't understand basic concepts such as probabilities, statistics and basic logic will lose their shirt in a casino.
Ignorance is bliss while everything seems to be fine. It is becomes lethal when it is not.

In this particular game, your ignorance will not only make you lose your money, it will make you lose your life or cripple you. But I guess everything I write here will fly over your head, because you think you know better.
Dunning-Kruger at its best.
 
Well, don't take it then. Roll the dice.
But let me tell you one thing, those who can't understand basic concepts such as probabilities, statistics and basic logic will lose their shirt in a casino.
Ignorance is bliss while everything seems to be fine. It is becomes lethal when it is not.

In this particular game, your ignorance will not only make you lose your money, it will make you lose your life or cripple you. But I guess everything I write here will fly over your head, because you think you know better.
Dunning-Kruger at its best.
Anyone making blanket statements like this doesn't understand probabilities, statistics and basic logic either.

Having at least a few brain cells allows many people to realise taking a novel vaccine is based on your own risk assessment and a conversation with a responsible medical doctor (i.e that still follows their Hippocratic oath) if you feel that is required to make a decision.

We have absolutely no idea about the OP's risk level. Is he/she 75 years old, morbidly obese with several other comorbidities? Maybe he should take the vaccine. Or are they 32 and healthy? Then the risks of the disease are near zero that even a perfectly safe vaccine would be unnecessary. But considering this jab that has adverse reactions off the charts, then the benefits are non-existent.

And the OP is essentially correct, follow the money and you will find a whole web of corruption.
 
Anyone making blanket statements like this doesn't understand probabilities, statistics and basic logic either.

Having at least a few brain cells allows many people to realise taking a novel vaccine is based on your own risk assessment and a conversation with a responsible medical doctor (i.e that still follows their Hippocratic oath) if you feel that is required to make a decision.

We have absolutely no idea about the OP's risk level. Is he/she 75 years old, morbidly obese with several other comorbidities? Maybe he should take the vaccine. Or are they 32 and healthy? Then the risks of the disease are near zero that even a perfectly safe vaccine would be unnecessary. But considering this jab that has adverse reactions off the charts, then the benefits are non-existent.

And the OP is essentially correct, follow the money and you will find a whole web of corruption.
OP didn't talk about comorbidities or actual research, he is spewing tinfoil conspiration theories that are irrelevant to any sane discourse.

But I guess you also failed at reading comprehension and you are trapped in apophenia. And neither of you seem to have passed a single course of bio 101.
Good luck, have fun in your own reality.
 
OP didn't talk about comorbidities or actual research, he is spewing tinfoil conspiration theories that are irrelevant to any sane discourse.

But I guess you also failed at reading comprehension and you are trapped in apophenia. And neither of you seem to have passed a single course of bio 101.
Good luck, have fun in your own reality.
Well you didn't rebut a single part of my thread other than "I guess you didn't do basic biology"
 
  • Like
Reactions: EuroKiss
Anyone's choice should be respected, no matter what that choice is.

Obliging someone to inject a toxic substance is simply not done. Those who want it, can take it. Others should be free to decide.

It is NOT normal you can not travel where ever you want to travel and whenever you want to travel.

It is something we should ALL be very concerned about.

Soon there will be no freedom left.

I'ld like to know about 1 freedom respecting country as well where personal choice IS normal.
 
Im not vaccinated myself but I heard from some people close to me they didn't feel good at all after 2nd dose of phitzer. This pandemic, virus since beginning is shady we don't know where it come from or anything about it. How can some people die, and some others not even have sympthoms. First they were saying there won't be a vaccine for 4 years, now you have 10 different ones to choose from. But the worst thing is none of them seems to guarantee 100% protection. One partner of mine from Italy, told me his collegue 52 years old died from covid19 after 3 weeks being sick, but she was vaccinated with 1 dose only of phitzer. I asked him are they sure she died from covid he said 100%
 
Im not vaccinated myself but I heard from some people close to me they didn't feel good at all after 2nd dose of phitzer. This pandemic, virus since beginning is shady we don't know where it come from or anything about it. How can some people die, and some others not even have sympthoms. First they were saying there won't be a vaccine for 4 years, now you have 10 different ones to choose from. But the worst thing is none of them seems to guarantee 100% protection. One partner of mine from Italy, told me his collegue 52 years old died from covid19 after 3 weeks being sick, but she was vaccinated with 1 dose only of phitzer. I asked him are they sure she died from covid he said 100%
That's basic biology, it doesn't require shady conspiracies to make sense of it. Everyone is different. Your diet is different, your lifestyle is different, your exposure to chemicals in the environment you live in will be different and your genetics will be different.
The basic template of how the immune system should work is the same, but there are environmental and genetic conditions that make that your innate immune system could be either normal, stronger or weaker than the mean.

And all this nonsense that "it doesn't offer 100% protection", there are never certainties in the world, not even in physics. What we CAN do is to reduce likelihood of something happening, and in medicine is always an equation about risk and benefit.
Even fever is a "natural" immune response that plays with the likelihood of killing an infection with heat before it toasts your your body's cells, most times it works but sometimes it doesn't and you can die from it. The same logic is applied with chemotherapy, the drugs stop cellular reproduction to stop the cancer cells from reproducing, but it also affects every cell in your body as well and it is the hope that it will kill the cancer cells in your body first before the drugs kill you. It is always a calculated risk and playing with probabilities, and there are no certainties.

Historically flu vaccines have about 40% of efficacy. The fact that mRNA vaccines could offer 90%+ in preventing infection it is a historical milestone, it is truly a homerun in molecular biology.
But that's only the cherry on the top, the true purpose of a vaccine is always PREVENTING DEATH. Controlling contagiousness is just an extra. Before vaccines existed, we had variolation and that had a fatality rate of 2%, but nobody even doubted in applying it as it was way better than smallpox's 40% fatality rate.
It is always an equation of risk benefit, and currently the benefits of getting a vaccine are overwhelmingly evident. Every single "side effect" you may get from the vaccine is 10x worse with a "natural infection".

The fact that most vaccines usually take half a decade to develop is due to the traditional way that vaccines are done. Every single vaccine has been following the following process:
1) Isolate the virus
2) Make it replicate in chicken eggs or in monkey kidneys
3) Collect them and inactivate them by weakening it with chemicals
4) Test that it doesn't have pathogens in your vaccine.

And that is only if the process itself has been vetted and the efficacy of the vaccine has been thoroughly tested with animals and humans.
If it is a novel development you have to add previous steps:
0) Clinical trials with humans
-1) Regulatory authorization for tests on humans
-2) Animal trials
-3) In Vivo experiments
-4) In Vitro experiments

The reason that the vaccines for COVID has been so fast, it is obviously because it was given a global priority to it. Bureaucracy has been simplified, clinical trials have been combined to overlap stages. But mainly the development of this new way of producing vaccines doesn't require the "capture" of a live sample of the virus to make them reproduce in bioreactors, which is messy as you can imagine.
That is the revolutionary aspect of the mRNA vaccines.
We advanced a lot with DNA sequencing, and we also had DNA printers for a while.
So if a team in the antipodes of the planet finds a virus, they can sequence the DNA and then simply email it to a lab in Europe and literally start printing it out and bottling it. No more waiting for weeks for eggs or kidneys to reproduce viruses to then harvesting them, weakening them, etc...

One of the main reasons we couldn't eradicate influenza is because it can mutate faster than what we could produce vaccines. But right now the tide has changed, we can now produce vaccines for new mutations in a week instead of months, not only that we can precisely engineer antibodies to produce and not only to viral infections, we could manufacture a protein that actually works like a marker for cancer cells. mRNA vaccines will open a new chapter in immunotherapy.

Btw, you MUST get two doses of the vaccine otherwise you won't be protected enough. Also, it is better if you space the vaccines about four months between them to get the optimal reaction.
Also, you WON'T be protected until 14 days has passed from getting vaccinated, as that is the time that it takes for your body to recognize the "threat" and start activating your immune system.
If you get infected with COVID the next day after getting a vaccination, it will be as if you weren't vaccinated at all.
The activation of T-Cells takes between one or two weeks.
 
Last edited:
Very good explanation supporting the political requirement for all to get vaccinated. I invite your attention to the use of Ivermectin by India which has resulted in reducing deaths and outbreaks, almost to the Zero point. I understand this is not approved and discouraged, extremely dangerous and should be criminalized; however, the results have been documented. Similar treatment has also been used in other third world countries not affected by politics, but having a desire to live. I really don't need a government looking out for me, especially the US government! Every decision made by this government is based on greed, corruption and lies, both domestic and foreign. The USA is the bully of the world, forcing every country to yield or be destroyed. The space is not available for the list...
 
That's basic biology, it doesn't require shady conspiracies to make sense of it. Everyone is different. Your diet is different, your lifestyle is different, your exposure to chemicals in the environment you live in will be different and your genetics will be different.
The basic template of how the immune system should work is the same, but there are environmental and genetic conditions that make that your innate immune system could be either normal, stronger or weaker than the mean.

And all this nonsense that "it doesn't offer 100% protection", there are never certainties in the world, not even in physics. What we CAN do is to reduce likelihood of something happening, and in medicine is always an equation about risk and benefit.
Even fever is a "natural" immune response that plays with the likelihood of killing an infection with heat before it toasts your your body's cells, most times it works but sometimes it doesn't and you can die from it. The same logic is applied with chemotherapy, the drugs stop cellular reproduction to stop the cancer cells from reproducing, but it also affects every cell in your body as well and it is the hope that it will kill the cancer cells in your body first before the drugs kill you. It is always a calculated risk and playing with probabilities, and there are no certainties.

Historically flu vaccines have about 40% of efficacy. The fact that mRNA vaccines could offer 90%+ in preventing infection it is a historical milestone, it is truly a homerun in molecular biology.
But that's only the cherry on the top, the true purpose of a vaccine is always PREVENTING DEATH. Controlling contagiousness is just an extra. Before vaccines existed, we had variolation and that had a fatality rate of 2%, but nobody even doubted in applying it as it was way better than smallpox's 40% fatality rate.
It is always an equation of risk benefit, and currently the benefits of getting a vaccine are overwhelmingly evident. Every single "side effect" you may get from the vaccine is 10x worse with a "natural infection".

The fact that most vaccines usually take half a decade to develop is due to the traditional way that vaccines are done. Every single vaccine has been following the following process:
1) Isolate the virus
2) Make it replicate in chicken eggs or in monkey kidneys
3) Collect them and inactivate them by weakening it with chemicals
4) Test that it doesn't have pathogens in your vaccine.

And that is only if the process itself has been vetted and the efficacy of the vaccine has been thoroughly tested with animals and humans.
If it is a novel development you have to add previous steps:
0) Clinical trials with humans
-1) Regulatory authorization for tests on humans
-2) Animal trials
-3) In Vivo experiments
-4) In Vitro experiments

The reason that the vaccines for COVID has been so fast, it is obviously because it was given a global priority to it. Bureaucracy has been simplified, clinical trials have been combined to overlap stages. But mainly the development of this new way of producing vaccines doesn't require the "capture" of a live sample of the virus to make them reproduce in bioreactors, which is messy as you can imagine.
That is the revolutionary aspect of the mRNA vaccines.
We advanced a lot with DNA sequencing, and we also had DNA printers for a while.
So if a team in the antipodes of the planet finds a virus, they can sequence the DNA and then simply email it to a lab in Europe and literally start printing it out and bottling it. No more waiting for weeks for eggs or kidneys to reproduce viruses to then harvesting them, weakening them, etc...

One of the main reasons we couldn't eradicate influenza is because it can mutate faster than what we could produce vaccines. But right now the tide has changed, we can now produce vaccines for new mutations in a week instead of months, not only that we can precisely engineer antibodies to produce and not only to viral infections, we could manufacture a protein that actually works like a marker for cancer cells. mRNA vaccines will open a new chapter in immunotherapy.

Btw, you MUST get two doses of the vaccine otherwise you won't be protected enough. Also, it is better if you space the vaccines about four months between them to get the optimal reaction.
Also, you WON'T be protected until 14 days has passed from getting vaccinated, as that is the time that it takes for your body to recognize the "threat" and start activating your immune system.
If you get infected with COVID the next day after getting a vaccination, it will be as if you weren't vaccinated at all.
The activation of T-Cells takes between one or two weeks.

This post is riddled with disinformation. It is full of the same talking points media bobbleheads and pharma funded scientists keep trotting out. You can probably find this exact post on several forums as its soundbite followed by soundbite.

"Historically flu vaccines have about 40% of efficacy. The fact that mRNA vaccines could offer 90%+ in preventing infection it is a historical milestone, it is truly a homerun in molecular biology."

They COULD also offer 0% in preventing infection. Which hypothesis is correct? As it currently stands, once high serum antibody levels have dropped off, it's closer to 0%. Which Pfizer obviously knew, but the clinical trials were designed to mask that. It was 90% deception, not 90% protection.

" currently the benefits of getting a vaccine are overwhelmingly evident. Every single "side effect" you may get from the vaccine is 10x worse with a "natural infection".

Where is the data to support that broad claim? You said it's a case of risk-benefit. But then say that regardless of who you are, that the disease is 10 times worse. Are you claiming that a 15-year-old who develops myocarditis from the vaccine, could have expected 10 times worse from the disease?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: melzvy and Member
That's basic biology, it doesn't require shady conspiracies to make sense of it. Everyone is different. Your diet is different, your lifestyle is different, your exposure to chemicals in the environment you live in will be different and your genetics will be different.
The basic template of how the immune system should work is the same, but there are environmental and genetic conditions that make that your innate immune system could be either normal, stronger or weaker than the mean.

And all this nonsense that "it doesn't offer 100% protection", there are never certainties in the world, not even in physics. What we CAN do is to reduce likelihood of something happening, and in medicine is always an equation about risk and benefit.
Even fever is a "natural" immune response that plays with the likelihood of killing an infection with heat before it toasts your your body's cells, most times it works but sometimes it doesn't and you can die from it. The same logic is applied with chemotherapy, the drugs stop cellular reproduction to stop the cancer cells from reproducing, but it also affects every cell in your body as well and it is the hope that it will kill the cancer cells in your body first before the drugs kill you. It is always a calculated risk and playing with probabilities, and there are no certainties.

Historically flu vaccines have about 40% of efficacy. The fact that mRNA vaccines could offer 90%+ in preventing infection it is a historical milestone, it is truly a homerun in molecular biology.
But that's only the cherry on the top, the true purpose of a vaccine is always PREVENTING DEATH. Controlling contagiousness is just an extra. Before vaccines existed, we had variolation and that had a fatality rate of 2%, but nobody even doubted in applying it as it was way better than smallpox's 40% fatality rate.
It is always an equation of risk benefit, and currently the benefits of getting a vaccine are overwhelmingly evident. Every single "side effect" you may get from the vaccine is 10x worse with a "natural infection".

The fact that most vaccines usually take half a decade to develop is due to the traditional way that vaccines are done. Every single vaccine has been following the following process:
1) Isolate the virus
2) Make it replicate in chicken eggs or in monkey kidneys
3) Collect them and inactivate them by weakening it with chemicals
4) Test that it doesn't have pathogens in your vaccine.

And that is only if the process itself has been vetted and the efficacy of the vaccine has been thoroughly tested with animals and humans.
If it is a novel development you have to add previous steps:
0) Clinical trials with humans
-1) Regulatory authorization for tests on humans
-2) Animal trials
-3) In Vivo experiments
-4) In Vitro experiments

The reason that the vaccines for COVID has been so fast, it is obviously because it was given a global priority to it. Bureaucracy has been simplified, clinical trials have been combined to overlap stages. But mainly the development of this new way of producing vaccines doesn't require the "capture" of a live sample of the virus to make them reproduce in bioreactors, which is messy as you can imagine.
That is the revolutionary aspect of the mRNA vaccines.
We advanced a lot with DNA sequencing, and we also had DNA printers for a while.
So if a team in the antipodes of the planet finds a virus, they can sequence the DNA and then simply email it to a lab in Europe and literally start printing it out and bottling it. No more waiting for weeks for eggs or kidneys to reproduce viruses to then harvesting them, weakening them, etc...

One of the main reasons we couldn't eradicate influenza is because it can mutate faster than what we could produce vaccines. But right now the tide has changed, we can now produce vaccines for new mutations in a week instead of months, not only that we can precisely engineer antibodies to produce and not only to viral infections, we could manufacture a protein that actually works like a marker for cancer cells. mRNA vaccines will open a new chapter in immunotherapy.

Btw, you MUST get two doses of the vaccine otherwise you won't be protected enough. Also, it is better if you space the vaccines about four months between them to get the optimal reaction.
Also, you WON'T be protected until 14 days has passed from getting vaccinated, as that is the time that it takes for your body to recognize the "threat" and start activating your immune system.
If you get infected with COVID the next day after getting a vaccination, it will be as if you weren't vaccinated at all.
The activation of T-Cells takes between one or two weeks.
In order to answer this post and consider what is relevant, you need to look deeper and further than the current situation. Since you were born you have been conditioned to accept the ideas that form this current society, ideas that were created at some point by a group or collective with an objective in mind. We are educated and deeply suggested to accept and “trust” the ideas we are told, almost as if they are fact or truth.

So we go to school and “trust” what we are told because everyone does, and we trust it so much that we choose not to question it more deeply and fail to ask the questions of who made the system and why. We clearly believe as the writer of this post does that it was built for our own benefit and the benefit of our families. Why? Because it seems possible or likely or is what is inferred.

On further inspection however, we find that above the government are a panel of creators that operate globally. They own the banks, the finance system and money, the weapons corps, the information and media, pharma, infrastructure and most large corporations and their management and it is them who pull the strings of government and decide on “education”. Education incidentally is another word for conditioning and is simply us being programmed with their facts and what they need us to believe for their system to operate.

As we look further we then see that debt, war, disease and ego are the fundamentals of their system. It uses the people like farm animals to work hard, running in a hamster wheel to pay tax and survive, all the while believing they elect government from a choice usually of two parties and on only a subset of values and beliefs, thinking we have a choice. We really don’t and it's irrelevant who takes control, the society continues fueled with debt, war, disease and propaganda to create fear and ego with the effect that we all run faster in our hamster wheels just to survive.

As we all work hard our tax is vacuumed up by this system and importantly that panel at the top. Governments spend our tax money on what THEY are selling being debt, weapons, pharma and infrastructure and information. The system uses and creates ego to fuel our wish to succeed, all the while just making the hamsters go faster and pay more taxes. It's elegant and some would say beautiful.

To the crew at the top we are simply cattle, the sheep and the cows that keep the money coming, while they are the farmers. They see us as a means to an end and they care little about our welfare unless it benefits THEM. Sadly however with the advent of AI and automation our value and the value of the masses is now limited and reducing daily. As the farmers they are, they need to reduce the numbers without emotion because farming is an expensive game if there's no use for what you cultivate and grow. That's where we are right now. We are simply a cost.

We can either see this for what it is and make preparations, while hoping to be wrong or we can trust and believe that it’s all there for our good, denying the underlying factual reality. My own choice is to prepare for the worst and hope for the best, believing that the facts don’t lie and that we can see the system at work and on full view for the very first time right now.

The idea that this is a conspiracy “theory” or the result of “trust issues” is an unfortunate and hopeful thought, created by people who simply cannot conceive of the reality around us. The discussion is pointless and the facts are the facts, the only choice now is prepare for the worst or don’t. If you prepare you may survive to see a new earth, if not you may not. Ironically it will be the hope that seals your fate but remember that it’s okay to prepare and to hope too. It’s the hope without reality and preparation that will have you in the wrong group, off to market for slaughter with a huge number of the other cattle.

Avoid the vaccine and watch the facts. More is coming and you can see it if you look :)
 
In the current scenario of 1984 on steroids, I may be labeled almost anything, and possibly disappear, but I haven't heard anyone else say this: Does anyone sense mass hysteria?! Simple question: What danger does an Unvaxed individual pose? Well, first of all, uh, well first we need to... There is no danger to anyone!!! The Unvaxed are not contagious- they don't have anything to pass along, except maybe common sense. Being touched by the Unvaxed doesn't change your Vaxed status; They can perform as well as the Vaxed; they will not be late for work or destroy your business; Think!! Why fire someone because they refused to take a shot? What is the reason?? Tell me why I am an idiot! Theis no reason. Why brag about being 100% "compliant"? You haven't accomplished anything worth a cup of warm spit! Mass Hysteria- Heil...! Heil...! Heil...
[email protected]