Hello,
I've searched for info about the following topic with the forum search but couldnt find sufficient information.
The situation: Person X is living in country Y. Payment processors dont like country Y, and because of that, Person X cant accept payments for his company (which is based in his country).
The proposed solution: Person X opens a "payment management/processing/VAT managing/whatever" company in a payment-friendly (or at least payment-possible) location, lets say HK, and onboards his company in country Y as a client (the first and only) to his newly founded payment company in HK.
From now on Person X funnels a few million USD through that scheme every year, stays in his lovely homecountry happily accepting payments from all over the world while paying the payment company 1-2% for its service. He pays all taxes on that 1-2% in HK and of course in his homecountry. His homecountry company just invoices the payment company for the amount the company earned with its service.
This looks like the ideal solution to me for payment troubles. Does anyone run something like this? Do you guys see any pitfall in this?
I've searched for info about the following topic with the forum search but couldnt find sufficient information.
The situation: Person X is living in country Y. Payment processors dont like country Y, and because of that, Person X cant accept payments for his company (which is based in his country).
The proposed solution: Person X opens a "payment management/processing/VAT managing/whatever" company in a payment-friendly (or at least payment-possible) location, lets say HK, and onboards his company in country Y as a client (the first and only) to his newly founded payment company in HK.
From now on Person X funnels a few million USD through that scheme every year, stays in his lovely homecountry happily accepting payments from all over the world while paying the payment company 1-2% for its service. He pays all taxes on that 1-2% in HK and of course in his homecountry. His homecountry company just invoices the payment company for the amount the company earned with its service.
This looks like the ideal solution to me for payment troubles. Does anyone run something like this? Do you guys see any pitfall in this?
Last edited: