Thanks but if you read my question I requested steps other than "trust me", sorry but I am sure there are better more reliable ways people use.
Thanks again for your answer
Hi,
I will agree with what Sols has mentioned above. Just some brief ideas about this:
(a) Use a law firm's nominee services as it has been suggested above.
(b) Nominee directors are mostly used to show substance and control in Cyprus - you could also put yourself in the board as well so that you have decision making powers and more control (majority is better to be Cyprus directors though).
(c) Structure the company's M&A so as to require shareholder's approval for the important decisions.
(d) You will enter into a service agreement with the nominee.
(e) Nominees are also in a 'risky' position as directors in a company could even be held criminally liable, therefore an indemnity agreement may be requested, this could be made two-sided, protecting you as well.
(f) As shareholder you will have access to the financial statements and accounts.
(g) All of the above are mentioned on the basis that you will be living abroad, in the event that you will be permanently relocating in Cyprus, renting/purchasing property etc the a nominee director may not be necessary at all.
(h) It should be noted that nominees are regulated by the Cyprus Bar and/or CySEC (depending on whether it is a law firm or an ASP).
(i) Finally, directors of a company have liability under Cyprus Companies Law. The Company and/or liquidator can claim against the directors for breach of fiduciary and/or statutory duties. Also, I am giving a UK case law example - If a director in breach of his fiduciary duties made a personal profit out of a business transaction, then he will be liable to pay that profit to the company. As illustrated in
Bairstow v Queens Moat Houses plc [2001] 2 BCLC 531, CA, directors are obliged when they act in breach of duty to make good any misapplication by them of the company’s assets. In specific, this case considered a team of former directors who had declared unlawful dividends. The Court of Appeal held that the former directors were liable to repay the entire amount of unlawful dividends regardless of whether the company might through other mechanisms have lawfully declared such dividends with the result that there was no loss to the company.