Hi everyone,
Thanks for your responses on the previous thread I created - I didn’t expect this to generated such a heated debate.
I have re-read this thread to try to arrive at some conclusions:
1- The Cyprus Non-Dom program grants you tax residency provided you a) spend 60 days in Cyprus and no more than 183 days in any other and b) you are not a tax resident anywhere else
2- Spain will try to fight for your tax residency - if they succeed, the Non-Dom is void.
3 - Hacienda considers you a fiscal resident if you meet any of these rules: +183 days, centre of economic interest (direct or indirect), wife/kids residing in Spain
4 - In my particular case, the tricky part is “centre of economic interest”
5 - If I can prove that my centre of economic interest (direct or indirect) is not Spain then I should not be considered a tax resident in Spain
6 - If I am not considered a tax resident in Spain and I meet the Non-Dom criteria, I am considered a tax resident in Cyprus
7 - It is only at this point where the Double Taxation Agreement would come into place
8 - Article 4 of the DTT states that “Having a permanent home available to him” is the first criteria, and implies that only if this condition is not met will there be a need to go to the next levels (ie centre of vital interests/habitual abode/national).
----
Please let me know your thoughts on the above conclusion.
If it is correct, the question then becomes how do you define “centre of economic interest” (point 5):
Does generating 51% of your global income outside of Spain (directly & indirectly), and meeting the 183 days & family rules exempt you from being considered a Spanish tax resident?
All of this aside, I think it makes sense to consider a better structure (most likely outside of the EU).
Thanks!
Thanks for your responses on the previous thread I created - I didn’t expect this to generated such a heated debate.
I have re-read this thread to try to arrive at some conclusions:
1- The Cyprus Non-Dom program grants you tax residency provided you a) spend 60 days in Cyprus and no more than 183 days in any other and b) you are not a tax resident anywhere else
2- Spain will try to fight for your tax residency - if they succeed, the Non-Dom is void.
3 - Hacienda considers you a fiscal resident if you meet any of these rules: +183 days, centre of economic interest (direct or indirect), wife/kids residing in Spain
4 - In my particular case, the tricky part is “centre of economic interest”
5 - If I can prove that my centre of economic interest (direct or indirect) is not Spain then I should not be considered a tax resident in Spain
6 - If I am not considered a tax resident in Spain and I meet the Non-Dom criteria, I am considered a tax resident in Cyprus
7 - It is only at this point where the Double Taxation Agreement would come into place
8 - Article 4 of the DTT states that “Having a permanent home available to him” is the first criteria, and implies that only if this condition is not met will there be a need to go to the next levels (ie centre of vital interests/habitual abode/national).
----
Please let me know your thoughts on the above conclusion.
If it is correct, the question then becomes how do you define “centre of economic interest” (point 5):
Does generating 51% of your global income outside of Spain (directly & indirectly), and meeting the 183 days & family rules exempt you from being considered a Spanish tax resident?
All of this aside, I think it makes sense to consider a better structure (most likely outside of the EU).
Thanks!