I disagree. Singapore makes no sense If he is not willing to do any business or move to Singapore, he will just add extra costs with none of the benefits of HK. the only two points that I'm willing to give to Singapore is the tax treaties that they have with other countries and their strong baking system. But for his specific case, most manufactures/businesses have strong presence in HK, so it will be easier for him to operate his business from HK than Singapore.In that case and considering the political climate in China/Hong Kong, Singapore is probably going to be the best option of the two. It's stable and has a bright future ahead of it, whereas Hong Kong is full of uncertainty at this point. Banking is difficult but as long as you do business in the region, you'll probably be all right.
Make sure you discuss the tax aspects of your business with a tax adviser or lawyer (both locally and in Singapore, to be safe). If you have significant presence in The Philippines, the company may still be considered Philippine for tax purposes.
Yeah, but budget aside, HK is really really important if he wants to funnel his money from china to his country of residence. I said it in another thread that HK is china's capitalist bridge to the west.In the grand scheme of things, the costs of HK vs Singapore are negligible once a business is turning over a few hundred thousand. But if costs are a key consideration and budget is very tight, HK is the cheaper option.
Yep, for raising funds, Singapore makes more sense, since VCs in both Singapore and the rest of the world (mainly silicon valley) are very comfortable with Singapore companies.But from a VC/fund raising and corporate reputability perspective, Singapore is far better today. Investors are spooked by what's going on in HK, whereas Singapore is thriving.
I agree, and he can make use of great tax incentives like Singapore Headquarter scheme.Depending on the exact details, a Singapore parent/holding with a HK trading company could also work out nicely.