Have often thought about this and just assumed there was a catch I wasn't aware of.
But from what the replies here say I can:
a) set up an offshore company in
seychelles "offshore computing solutions ltd"
b) setup a company in UK "payment solutions ltd"
"Payment solutions ltd" is a legit UK company, everything above board, file taxes, everything legit. They get a UK bank account, paypal, whatever. Build them a website and offer to process payments for any company (but never accept anyone).
"offshore computing solutions ltd" then signs up to use "payment solutions ltd" and obviously gets accepted. They act like a proper processor, charge 5% to process payments, keep a float of some of the payments and then transfers each month the remainder to "offshore computing solutions".
And that is completely above board? If there anyway, that "payment solutions" could be liable for actions taken by "offshore computing"? If someone wanted to sue "offshore computing" and figured out "payment solutions" was just a sister company, could that be a problem? As obviously "payment solutions" would be listed in company house?
Would it possible to use similar names?
offshore: JohnSmith Computing
uk: johnsmith payments
Being blatant that they are sister companies of the same people, are the actions of "johnsmith computing" still irrelevant to "johnsmith payments"