Nonsense. Exit tax has nothing to do with payments.
Nonsense. No country applies withholding taxes to payments for services.
Nonsense. Such things would not be regulated by a treaty.
Nonsense. Anti-avoidance rules are on the national level.
Hey, I think there's been a bit of a misunderstanding here.
Exit Tax: Yeah, you’re right,exit tax doesn’t apply here. I was more talking about taxes that might hit when money moves between countries, but exit tax as a term is off the mark, I’ll give you that.
Withholding Tax: Not all countries apply withholding taxes on services, sure. But it can happen in specific cases, depending on the country’s tax laws. It’s not universal, but it’s worth checking. The devil’s in the details with these laws, especially with cross-border payments. Some EU countries have withholding taxes on service payments to non-residents,just depends on the jurisdiction. for example, Italy applies a withholding tax on payments for services rendered by non-resident companies, including consulting fees. The standard rate is 30%, but if there’s a tax treaty in place (like with the UAE), it can lower that rate or eliminate it. Not every country does this, but it's not uncommon either. It just depends on the country's specific laws and the nature of the service being provided.
Tax Treaty: Yeah, treaties don’t regulate payments directly, but they often have clauses to avoid double taxation on cross-border payments. While they don’t dictate whether withholding applies, they can reduce or eliminate taxes in certain cases. It’s not something you just ignore when moving money between countries.
Anti-Avoidance Rules: These are both at the national and EU level. The EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) exists, but each member country also has its own anti-avoidance measures. It’s not purely one or the other.
So, yeah, it's a bit more nuanced. I wasn’t trying to say these apply across the board, but they’re definitely things to look at when making payments like this.