Our valued sponsor

juristic person without owner / beneficiaries - foundation? avoid liability, taxes, protect assets?

miner

New member
Jan 3, 2018
24
3
3
54
Visit site
"Own nothing, control everything." Does it work?

Is it possible to have a juristic person that does not have an owner?

A foundation is its own legal personality. It's owned by nobody. It owns itself.

A foundation cannot make business but it can own an IBC which does business.

Foundations vs. Trusts says "A foundation does not need to have any beneficiaries."
"As there are no shareholders or ‘owners’ and there is no requirement to have beneficiaries,"

So no owners, no beneficiaries, no shareholders.

Is it possible for an IBC owned by a foundation to get a bank account? Wouldn't the bank ask who is the UBO (ultimate beneficial owner) is? Is "there is none" an acceptable answer? :)

Could such a structure be used to legally avoid CFC (controlled foreign company laws)?

How to get money out of it? Well, a salary and paying income tax on it? At least company tax would be legally avoided.

How to get a lot money out of it? Become tax resident in a zero tax country, and if one controls the structure, no one is going to ask any questions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AMD
Is it possible to have a juristic person that does not have an owner?

Yes of course.

Is it possible for an IBC owned by a foundation to get a bank account? Wouldn't the bank ask who is the UBO (ultimate beneficial owner) is? Is "there is none" an acceptable answer? :)

It is not possible in 2018 to get a bank account for such an entity without declaring the UBO to bank. Don't waste your time going down this route its 2018. Bank needs to know human UBO. I have discussed this in another thread you can search for in forum when question was last asked.

Could such a structure be used to legally avoid CFC (controlled foreign company laws)?

Yes. Certain companies from certain countries have legally used such structures to circumvent sanctions. Problem is banking.

How to get money out of it? Well, a salary and paying income tax on it? At least company tax would be legally avoided.

You won't have an account to put money into in the first place so you won't reach stage of getting money out.

How to get a lot money out of it? Become tax resident in a zero tax country, and if one controls the structure, no one is going to ask any questions?

Why not just move to a zero tax country in first place and save yourself the stress. You are quoting articles from 2014 and we are in 2018. The world has moved on in terms of compliance and regulation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miner and MrTony
- So what is the solution in that case?

Declare the UBO to bank as is required.

- I don't know the OP, but I am fine where I am, until I accumulate enough funds in my offshore. Then I will move to a zero tax country for sure. But until then I want to make sure I won't get slapped by the tax authority. So in your opinion it's better to have a nominee shareholder to avoid CFC then a holding foundation?

That's a bit like a stripper saying I am only going to do this until I make enough money and then I will quit...lol. Face reality if your not moving now then there is little chance you will move later. When talking about accumulating funds offshore you need to look at you currently local tax law says to determine what is possible. Sadly building offshore funds secretly and then hoping to move at a later date will probably not work as governments have clocked on and will be closing all the doors on this practice.You also mentioned nominee shareholder but a nominee is just that a nominee. Much more substance is needed than a nominee in 2018 to avoid CFC :-(
 
To my understanding, CFC applies only if I am 50%+ shareholder of the offshore company.
So in the case when I am not a shareholder (because of a nominee 100% shareholder) but I am a director, the company should be considered CFC because even if I manage it (as a director) I am not the owner, I am just an employee... so why should the company pay taxes just because of an employee?

Correct me if I am wrong.

Do you know what a nominee is? You can get in trouble in some countries like Netherlands for creating such an artificial sham construct.

What country are you from firstly?
 
He will be in the company register as the shareholder I guess. Otherwise, why would I pay for that service?

So if the shareholder was asked under oath if he was a "genuine shareholder" or a "nominee shareholder" what would he reply in a court of law????? It is that simply to expose sham entities ;-) You would find yourself accused by taxman of creating an artificial construct to simply avoid paying taxes and that's the problem my friend.

I am from Hungary. And the CFC law says, the offshore company is considered CFC is you have 50%+ ownership.

I can't say I know anything about Hungarian tax laws. I would seek professional local tax advice. I imagine it cannot be that expensive to get a good lawyer for 2-3 hours work :)
 
A nominee shareholder from Belize will never go to Hungary to testify under oath.
And in Belize they have better things to do (getting tanned, finishing, surfing, etc) than citing nominees to the Belize court to ask them on behalf of the Hungarian taxmen.
I mean... yes, theoretically this is a possibility, just as much as an asteroid hits earth tomorrow and we all die. In my opinion at least.

I was being sarcastic to make the point that a nominee does not have your back for the i.e $200 you pay them a year. They will throw you to the wolves at the first official letter they receive from a government agency asking the same question.

The problem with that is I asked many lawyers and they can't think outside the box. They are not interested in giving me a solution, they only tell me what I can't do.
Also, many of them only know the laws but not how to use them to achieve something that you want. Same applies to accountants. 99% are only good to file your tax documents as they are, they have no clue how to lower your taxes. They are not interested in that, since they get the same payment if they think or just file like a mindless robot.

In 2018 the lawyers and accountants that offer these services are treated the same way as people who sell fur coats are - i.e it is no longer considered acceptable although it is still done.I would relocate to a tax friendly country and then setup all the offshore companies you want.
 
Yes of course.
Yes. Certain companies from certain countries have legally used such structures to circumvent sanctions. Problem is banking.

You won't have an account to put money into in the first place so you won't reach stage of getting money out.
I guess crypto currencies, Bitcoin or maybe in future the Theter alternative TrueCoin can help here? Certainly only a solution for a few people who can work like that. One could get paid in crypto currencies to business crypto currency account. Keep the money in the company. Reinvest. Cash out salary to private crypto currency account. I guess problem is finding a local tax adviser that could confirm this setup and even if looking up it would be uncharted water in the courts.
 
Don't you think that if you open a Mister Tango business account it could help for the local tax advisor to be able to sort this out? I wonder, since it would be easy to do business like this.
 
Not sure that question is for me or if I even get the question right.

A mistertango buisness account with such a setup would be paradise but I doubt mistertango would open a business account since there is no human UBO?

A private mistertango account might help the local tax advisor with personal income tax compliance though.
 

Latest Threads