Is there not an option to skip this ?Would you trust this statement when you place an order with them?
View attachment 7816
They are a company placed in Prague which is Europe, do you believe they delete all your data after 90 days?
Would you trust this statement when you place an order with them?
View attachment 7816
They are a company placed in Prague which is Europe, do you believe they delete all your data after 90 days?
Considering GDPR, they may delete them. Though, if they delete customer's data, how will customer claim the warranty? Above that, they're statutorily obliged to keep financial records for certain period - probably above 5 years.
For Payments:Exceptions apply for ongoing order-related issues. We are mandated to keep all invoice data for 10 years due to legal requirements. These invoices are kept in a separate environment as an encrypted backup.
FIAT : Data is stored by our third-party provider for up to 7 years.
Source : Privacy policy at TrezorCrypto : As per law, the third-party provider is obligated to retain all important data related to the transactions for 5 years after the termination of the relationship with Trezor.
either way when buying device like this online simply use fake personal details...
be creative...The problem is getting the device delivered to an address where you can pick it up, especially if it's not your own or a company address. For some people, that’s not so easy. But for those who can manage it, I completely agree that it’s the best solution.
The problem is getting the device delivered to an address where you can pick it up, especially if it's not your own or a company address. For some people, that’s not so easy. But for those who can manage it, I completely agree that it’s the best solution.
This could possibly work if I an find any of these lockers.There are also DHL lockers in some countries but they require mail address verification . You can probably buy verified accounts somewhere .
yeah that could be an optionTake a trip to Prague.
read this first User data protectionI wonder if it's intentional that these devices can only be bought online, so they can track who buys them and where they’re used, making it possible to trace the device when it's loaded with crypto!
I assume that if they know who bought Trezor with serial number XYZ, they could later track its address on the blockchain and see if it’s been loaded with crypto?
I've read many of your posts and others', and whenever it comes to being paranoid, you're always one of the first, along with others, to raise the alarm. Now that you know the people behind Trezor, your attitude changes, and that explains why you're such a strong advocate for this device!I know both guys who founded Trezor, good lads, true anarchokapitalists and freedom-oriented - I not always agree with what decisions they make but it's not my business (literally) - anyways there is very little chance of then being malicious actors... at the same time it doesn't mean that the company can't be attacked by any means
perhapsI've read many of your posts and others', and whenever it comes to being paranoid, you're always one of the first, along with others, to raise the alarm.
noNow that you know the people behind Trezor, your attitude changes, and that explains why you're such a strong advocate for this device!
okThat being said, I couldn’t care less whether you or some average Joe knows those guys.
maybe, that's way it's wise to have as little customer data as possible to minimize the surface for such an attackIf there's enough money or pressure on the table, everyone talks, and they’ll release data too.
be my guestThe comparison you've just described is something I'll refer to in the future when you start criticizing others for their security questions and suggestions. It's so universal that it's the trump card here - it beats all answers and all solutions when it comes to securing data
It's all very good, I don't attack you, I just find it strange all of it. It is a clear picture your can't trust Trezor!perhaps
no
ok
maybe, that's way it's wise to have as little customer data as possible to minimize the surface for such an attack
be my guest
there is always some trust involved - it's a question of economic calculation, I suggest to be as paranoid as possible where the cost is little and a qualified decision can be made) and to let it fully go where you can't do anything about whatsoever - it's a scale and your subjective decision, it can easily happen that one forgets to live in a pursuit of perfection