Our valued sponsor

Where should one keep their wealth to avoid future potential sanctions?

parhaps you're right
it doesn't change much on the fact that gold is a very bad way how to store value for an average person
It depends on your definition of "the average person." The average person in many countries, including the U.S., has very little savings and lives from paycheck to paycheck. Gold is very good insurance and a great store of value for those who have some level of wealth, especially in an inflationary environment. Typically, those people should place about ten percent of their investible wealth into gold as a hedge.
 
It depends on your definition of "the average person." The average person in many countries, including the U.S., has very little savings and lives from paycheck to paycheck. Gold is very good insurance and a great store of value for those who have some level of wealth, especially in an inflationary environment. Typically, those people should place about ten percent of their investible wealth into gold as a hedge.
ok, "average investor" that has some wealth to preserve
let's agree to disagree on whether it's a good investment for these times
but as you pointed out you don't put 20 or 50% to gold - 5-10% doesn't change much - you have to do something with the rest...
 
Sometimes even cash is the best form of wealth, e.g., you expect a recession or a market meltdown and you wish to buy things when their prices hit rock bottom. It all depends on the stage of the economic cycle.
sure, personally I'm loaded with cash and ready

however this thread is about preservation of wealth and cash in the bank account is kind of "weak" in many aspects
 
Gold is traded much more than what people think…and bars travel from country to country in executive planes and re-certificated.
Any wealth outside of the financial system is weakness and strength alike.
However, the weak point is overwhelming: How to ever use these assets (if governments ban or restrict trading them)?
It might be possible to trade Gold bars against Silver, or silver against Platinum - things which can be done within e.g. SilverBullion/BullionStar. The difficulty will be to "cash out".

The best way to preserve wealth is to get used to ever changing regulation, adapt accordingly and find legal ways ... . Flag theory, hiding and offshore banking are outdated - they do not work anymore in todays' globalised world.
Irony of thoughts: Russians who kept their money in Russia still have full access - Russian who kept it in supposingly save offshore accounts can not use their funds anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: troubled soul
Irony of thoughts: Russians who kept their money in Russia still have full access - Russian who kept it in supposingly save offshore accounts can not use their funds anymore.
True, but that is because of external pressure under fairly unique circumstances. Typically, you will be trying to protect your wealth against internal threats in your home country (e.g., creditors, lawsuits, ex-spouses, government overreach, inflation, etc.).

I vehemently disagree that flag theory is outdated. Diversification amongst banks, vaults, exchanges, countries, and even continents is the best way to preserve wealth.
 
Everything you say is true, but I find it hard to believe that they could pull it off. There are certain actions that are big red flags for patriots -- and that would create a huge backlash with mass civil disobedience.

In the U.S., one such thing is banning firearms, which are correctly seen as are badges of liberty. Restricting gold might be another. Citizens are now far less tolerant of such dictatorial actions than they were in 1933 when President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 6102.

Of course, if such restrictions on liberty are enacted during a severe panic anything is possible.
Easy. Just look what they managed to pull of since 2020 ;)

Restricting Gold is a walk in the park since only a tiny minority has interest in it anyway.
 
Easy. Just look what they managed to pull of since 2020 ;)

Restricting Gold is a walk in the park since only a tiny minority has interest in it anyway.

I agree I feel they can pull this restriction off. Right now its only gold transactions involving Russian central bank and certain Russian entities etc but read the text below.

This makes processing payments involving physical gold that much harder for financial institutions globally now. What bank anywhere will want to accept funds from gold transactions with this threat from US :confused:.

For me going near gold is not a good idea outside of buying a few coins.


------ start quote

In addition, gold-related transactions involving Russia or the Russian Federation may be prohibited under E.O. 14024 or other Russia-related sanctions authorities. For example:

Sanctioned Russian persons are known to employ a wide variety of measures in their efforts to evade U.S. and international sanctions. As such, U.S. persons, wherever located, including persons that process or facilitate gold-related transactions, must be vigilant against attempts to circumvent OFAC regulations and must take risk-based steps to ensure they do not engage in prohibited transactions.

Violations of OFAC regulations may result in criminal or civil penalties. OFAC is closely monitoring any efforts to circumvent or violate Russia-related sanctions, including through the use of gold or other precious metals, and is committed to using its authorities to act against sanctions evaders, and promote compliance.

------ end quote
 
  • Like
Reactions: troubled soul
I agree I feel they can pull this restriction off. Right now its only gold transactions involving Russian central bank and certain Russian entities etc but read the text below.

This makes processing payments involving physical gold that much harder for financial institutions globally now. What bank anywhere will want to accept funds from gold transactions with this threat from US :confused:.

For me going near gold is not a good idea outside of buying a few coins.


------ start quote

In addition, gold-related transactions involving Russia or the Russian Federation may be prohibited under E.O. 14024 or other Russia-related sanctions authorities. For example:

Sanctioned Russian persons are known to employ a wide variety of measures in their efforts to evade U.S. and international sanctions. As such, U.S. persons, wherever located, including persons that process or facilitate gold-related transactions, must be vigilant against attempts to circumvent OFAC regulations and must take risk-based steps to ensure they do not engage in prohibited transactions.

Violations of OFAC regulations may result in criminal or civil penalties. OFAC is closely monitoring any efforts to circumvent or violate Russia-related sanctions, including through the use of gold or other precious metals, and is committed to using its authorities to act against sanctions evaders, and promote compliance.

------ end quote
Gold is carried to friendly nations that have gold mines too, re-certified as if extracted there and fly towards friendly banks, mainly Dubai. OFAC have no power against this kind of traffic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: daxbr
Gold is carried to friendly nations that have gold mines too, re-certified as if extracted there and fly towards friendly banks, mainly Dubai. OFAC have no power against this kind of traffic.

The US warning is clear - even for people that facilitate Russia evading sanctions. I highly doubt anyone would take the risk to try their luck for a quick margin on a gold trade. Having a country, business or yourself put on a US sanction blacklist (effectively global blacklist) is not good :confused:. We seen what US is capable off with i.e Loyal Bank to test compliance...lol. I imagine they will happily pose as undercover Russian intermediaries looking to launder gold and will see who falls for the bate.
 
In such situation of food insecurity then owning crop producing land would mean the value of your investment could increase. Expropriation due to national security concerns is always a problem however. Not sure what can be done about that sadly.
Well the only thing that can be done in case of possible expropriations done by governments in behalf of "national interests" is having your own private army for defending your own interests against the government ones.
That's what landowners in banana republics did for centuries(and works).
Well probably in a few years living in one of these "banana republics" as one of these rich landowners is a good idea compared to living in a undemocratic totalitarian western world....
 
Well the only thing that can be done in case of possible expropriations done by governments in behalf of "national interests" is having your own private army for defending your own interests against the government ones.

Today's wealthy have their own private armies called lobbyists.

Well probably in a few years living in one of these "banana republics" as one of these rich landowners is a good idea compared to living in a undemocratic totalitarian western world....

This may actually be true. We live in a world today where people get rich by doing nothing productive other than sitting on appreciating land or in a appreciating home. I hope the concept of Lord and Serf does not return.

I think the way sanctions have unfolded has shown you got to hold assets in a way that there is no connection back to yourself. I know that islands like Bahamas can be just one scandal away from being blacklisted :confused:.
 
How were things between October 2018 and December 2020 when Bahamas was on the FATF monitoring list? Any issues sending/receiving foreign currencies?

No issues for me personally as I bank totally outside the Bahamas. I can't speak for anyone sending money into or out of Bahamas. But I know transfers are still clunky at best of times and high fees. But at least EU and FATF have finally gave us breathing room as of January 2022. EU follows US like a lost puppy naturally.


That's why the issue of asset protection against any future blacklisting or sanction is so important to me. People living in a western EU country or US take it for granted that they will be able to transact and will never see restrictions or funds blocked. Those living in developing countries, Eastern Europe or even Cyprus or Malta to an extent are aware of gray or blacklisting. Your always one scandal or crisis away from trouble with your banking system :confused:.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EuroKiss
Today's wealthy have their own private armies called lobbyists.
Well, Mr Everson, that was such an accurate reply but I was thinking more in actually an armed group of people assuming the power that the official government of a banana republic doesn't have there.

This may actually be true. We live in a world today where people get rich by doing nothing productive other than sitting on appreciating land or in a appreciating home. I hope the concept of Lord and Serf does not return.

I think the way sanctions have unfolded has shown you got to hold assets in a way that there is no connection back to yourself. I know that islands like Bahamas can be just one scandal away from being blacklisted :confused:.
Well, actually in today's world, specially in the European Union, governments(the lords) treat their "citizens" like their serf and it's like an updated version of feudalism where instead of working in the lord's fields, people have to pay a massive amount of taxes and need a license from the lord to being able to start a business.
Exactly, you have to hold assets in a way that there is no connection back to yourself and keep yourself a low profile to stand under the radar.

That's why living in a banana republic could be actually a great strategy, since corruption is a great tool for reaching your goals and getting the freedom that you wouldn't have in a western country
 
A proposed law would prohibit Russian non-residents from buying real estate in EU nations. Yet another reason to have a second citizenship or, at a minimum, a second residency.
The European Union added a ban on property transactions with Russian nationals to its sixth package of sanctions designed to raise pressure on Vladimir Putin. The European Commission’s proposal would halt property deals with Russian citizens, residents and entities -- prohibiting the sale or transfer, directly or indirectly, of “ownership rights in immovable property located within the territory of the Union or units in collective investment undertakings providing exposure to such immovable property,” according to the legal text seen by Bloomberg News.
The prohibition applies to Russians who are not EU citizens and lack a residency permit in EU member states. It doesn’t apply to those who carry citizenship or residency in the European Economic Area or Switzerland.
 

I hope its a miscommunication otherwise it is a very dangerous precedent. Collective punishment assumes every Russia passport holder agrees with Putin. To say a Russian i.e living in Germany or France because of their Russian passport can't buy a property in the country they have resided in for decades is worrying. Sounds like a flawed proposal or misinterpretation of what is proposed.

---- quote start

The European Commission’s proposal would halt property deals with Russian citizens, residents and entities -- prohibiting the sale or transfer, directly or indirectly, of “ownership rights in immovable property located within the territory of the Union or units in collective investment undertakings providing exposure to such immovable property,” according to the legal text seen by Bloomberg News.

----- quote end


Anyway lets keep to topic please. The subject is:

"Where should one keep their wealth to avoid future potential sanctions?"

Right now it seems like EU is no place to keep wealth if your passport is not strong. I always thought banana republics in South America confiscate wealth. I never thought I would see the day EU countries confiscate assets with no due process and the public cheer it on like clapping seals at a water park :(. I will see how this all plays but right now I will sideline EU for a while after having unloaded my EU government bonds already.
 

Latest Threads