Our valued sponsor

Cashing out crypto and then?

I didn't figure out you were that young.
LOL, I'm not even half way through life, according to the average life expectancy I should still be alive by then.
But I don't think I could spend that much money when 80 years old anyway, doing coke from a hookers a*s
would kill me then for sure.

Daniel, I think my fasting, NAD+, and metformin supplements should add even a few years more.
In the end it's not about duration, but quality of life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mercury
You mentioned average life expectancy, which won't get older than 82.
Deepseek suggests 84 at least, it states that as I have already survived my childhood and my wild teens, the life expectancy at the current point actually statistically increases, and also the location plays a role, as the absence of opiates and gun violence (non-US) adds 4-5 years as well. It's pretty interesting.

BTW: I didn't know you keep a book on me ;)
 
Long Term Investing for Octogenarians

When you get to be over 80, "long term investing" doesn't make much sense.

One of my smart young neighbors here in Manila BGC wanted me to put some money into his excellent investing strategy:

What’s that?

A major shopping mall called Market Market is being torn down. It will definitely be replaced in about 3-5 years with an even bigger mall, apartments, and more importantly, a major subway transit station.

He (IMO anyway) correctly predicts that the apartments now for sale across the street – for sale at around$300-$400 will easily double in value . He is going into highly leveraged deals

for as many as he can buy with little or no money down. Existing rents should cover holding costs with a slight negative cash flow. He needs investors.

To make a long story short, a 30% annual return (in Pesos or dollars) is all but assured. Should I (or YOU?) go into this deal with him?

It depends:

If my life expectancy was 20 years or more, maybe yes. But as it is, what difference will it make if when the deals mature I am in my 90's – very likely to be in heaven.



I write this to let Offshore Corp's more mature members that common sense dictates that "long term investing" may not be for you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vehzag and EliasIT
  • Like
Reactions: EliasIT
Long Term Investing for Octogenarians

When you get to be over 80, "long term investing" doesn't make much sense.

One of my smart young neighbors here in Manila BGC wanted me to put some money into his excellent investing strategy:

What’s that?

A major shopping mall called Market Market is being torn down. It will definitely be replaced in about 3-5 years with an even bigger mall, apartments, and more importantly, a major subway transit station.

He (IMO anyway) correctly predicts that the apartments now for sale across the street – for sale at around$300-$400 will easily double in value . He is going into highly leveraged deals

for as many as he can buy with little or no money down. Existing rents should cover holding costs with a slight negative cash flow. He needs investors.

To make a long story short, a 30% annual return (in Pesos or dollars) is all but assured. Should I (or YOU?) go into this deal with him?

It depends:

If my life expectancy was 20 years or more, maybe yes. But as it is, what difference will it make if when the deals mature I am in my 90's – very likely to be in heaven.



I write this to let Offshore Corp's more mature members that common sense dictates that "long term investing" may not be for you.
very very true, in your situation and your age you only focus on short term, long term is long over for you. Question is if you have sufficient with money if you should look into any investment at all, or just enjoy the max level of the rest of your life with what you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mercury
This. When people talk about investment they almost never consider life expectancy or rather healthy life expectancy, although that's a key criteria.
it depends on one's model of preferences, doesn't?
somebody cares solely about himself, somebody thinks about the offspring or future generations (family name), somebody is focused on a "legacy", company or brand - all options are perfectly legit but have totally different impact on one's actions
 
I'd invest in real estate where the general voting population is predominantly Libertarian (not Leftist in favor of regulating & soaking the rich). Also, low or no heavy ownership or carrying charges, like the crazy high taxes on property in places like California. Monaco is the only place I can think of. But unfortunately, the prices there have always been the highest in the world. Why? Because the super rich of the world can buy a place, get "legal residence" there in Monaco and pay NO income tax and no property tax.

Thirty years ago I looked at a very nice large 60 m2 studio ocean front super view apartment in the Monaco Star Condo. It was about $500,000 then. For less than that money I could buy in France, across the street, a newer, better apartment 3 times as big --which is exactly what I did.

What happened in the following 30 years?

The French building got older and needed more and more updating & costly repairs (like a new roof, new pool, plumbing, heating, etc.)
I paid roughly $2500 every month in taxes & other charges on the French condo. It went up in value from $350 to $3 million, in spite of zoning changes & a new apartment building , now partially blocking the sea view. Ths reduced the value by maybe 20% of what it would have been.

The Monaco studio apartment also incurred charges for repairs, modernization & upgrading. As workers & materials are more expensive in Monaco, it was about the same: $2500 a month over the 30 years.

Just like people (ha ha me!); All improved property gets older and needs repairs, even in Monaco. Two years ago, the market value of the studio was over $5 million ... Thus, values in Monaco increased more (in %) than in the nearby French Riviera. Then there was a landfill in Monaco, & a new building that cut off the sea view of the Monaco Star. This reduced the value of the studio by about 20% of what it would have been.

What's the moral of this story? What should you take away?
1) Real Estate in any good location will seem to go up in value by maybe 5 to 10% a year. But that is mainly because the value of fiat currency (paper money) is going down by that much. Obviously increasing demand for good location property makes the real value go up by even more than that.
2) Property in bad locations or even less good when things like the view being cut off can & will decline in value.
3) It is hard -- impossible to predict the future, although you can usually make a good guess based upon past performance and trends.

Bottom Line?
Where to buy now?
Usually, 1) any great URBAN locations where holding costs are low to nil & prices are very depressed. One such place is -- Biella, Italy, where prices are maybe 1/4 of similar places in Italy. This is way below most of Europe aside from Bulgaria and other undesirable locals. How about CHINA? Vietnam? Cambodia? Other places in Asia?
2)Places where the sentiment is not against property owners and landlords.
3) Always go for good quality construction!
4) I have found that using my "hundred house rule -- explained in my book Think Like A Tycoon" & seeking out DISTRESS PROERTY anywhere, to buy at under 1/2 of market value in an active market. You solve the problem(s) -- maybe by fixing the place up cosmetically ... Then you simplyrent & hold for appreciation or sell for a quick 50% profit. This has always been a sure money maker.
And that, my dear reader, is my 2c for today. Peter Taradash