@
Educate
You're seems to be very
arrogant to some extent.
The term "
compromised" means an
unauthorized code modification made by a
threat actor. Now, this is not the case when following legal order made by Government which they have to follow and you're understood wrongly about modification, the code modification has to be made into the
Bitcoin Network Protocol to allow seizure not the
GUI client.
Secondly, I never talked to you about
ETH or other currencies. I was talking about
economical plausible ways to seizure an asset class like
BTC.
WBTC can be used by Government to perform
inflation attack which allow
passive seizure of BTC. It's a passive attack vector.
A lot of exchanges support the exchange of
WBTC to
BTC.
WBTC price is same as BTC price.
Not only
WBTC, there are number of
private side chains like Liquid that also enable the possibility of
inflation attacks. We can't call this as an attack when Government doing it.
I estimated Bitcoin's
true price based on interactions with Industry pioneers and used that
academic research as
reference. The
price estimation is not made by the academics.
Given that many people in industry predict
BTC future price at
100k USD, what's wrong with when I say true price is $100-200 range?
The research of
BTC price inflation can be found here:
Is Bitcoin Really Un-Tethered? by John M. Griffin, Amin Shams :: SSRN
Thirdly,
With all due to respect, Everybody has a opinion. I respect your opinion but for a second, read what CSW said and forget his Satoshi claim. I was telling people about how to think about BTC more economically by reading CSW texts. He is a professor after-all.
I thought Craig as a scammer for years like you by thinking
too logically then I started to think
critically and
psychologically to see other side of him and by thinking too logically made myself feels like a robot.
Code is not the law. Same applies to Signing, Signing is not only way to prove identity of one. There are diversified way to prove identity of one. Craig privately signed keys to Gavin. Do you think BTC former lead dev Gavin as an low a IQ individual?
Tax do applies because the keys are in a trust. He did not inform the Australia government about the trust. There are legal implications too.
I met with Gavin and he shared me everything about that event.
Craig got hacked multiple times and he lost lot of data then he had to re-produce the documents and that made him like a fraud.
Don't trust Wayback Machine, Wayback was bribed to edit pages of Craig.
[1]
The Wayback Machine Is Deleting Evidence of Malware Sold to Stalkers
The reason why people so against CSW because CSW wishes for honest money that means you won't see BTC at 20k or 100k if people went with CSW hence certain people spent millions of dollars to do news and other kind stuff against Craig.
CSW is not a
scammer or conman because he did not
exploit his claim to raise money or set up
ICOs. When he start to develop BTC, he was so broke and he didn't wanted to raise money thru a VC because he hated the concept of VC so to finance BTC development - he sold Windows 0Day exploits to the UK and US government thru Dave Kleiman.
Originally, BTC developed for casinos to allow on boarding of US residents but around 2007 he redacted that idea then he wanted to solve the micro payments problem suffered by the Internet. He simply wanted to build a payment network that allow micro payments at lower cost so the websites does not have to display Ads to make money.
Now, Don't call me as a low IQ individual. There are a lot of people back him even the Tether founder back him and China oldest BTC mining pool and exchange founder too back him.
[1] Brock Pierce - Tether Founder
In his presentation at the AI & Blockchain Summit in Malta, the former Mighty Ducks star made an oblique reference to a Pokemon character—an advisor to Satoshi, named Brock.
decrypt.co
[2] Bobby Lee - BTCC Founder
Bobby Lee, the creator of the BTCC exchange, says that Craig Wright needs to come forward with more proof, but he won't dismiss his claims
u.today
Just alone, CSW Critic John McAfee too admit that Craig took a part of the creation of BTC but he don't believe he wrote the whitepaper.
[3]
I know many people more than these, but no point showing their names to you.
I don't own BTC, BSV, or GOLD. This is my personal belief. Time will tell you but your opinion is biased. Good luck!
cointelegraph.com
